Source: Representative Press
Date: 1/12/2012 upload date
Devious Reporter Lies to Sell another war to the public!
Don't Let Them Trick Us into Another War!
See These Videos, Click Here for Playlist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebqp-xaMfkc&list=PL90B5A93EDB34024C&fe...
Before
1979, the U.S. strongly supported Iran's nuclear energy programs.
Mainstream media is helping sell another illegal war. The way they do
this is mainly by not reporting things or under-reporting things.
"Introduction
of nuclear power will both provide for the growing needs of Iran's
economy and free remaining oil reserves for export or conversion to
petrochemicals" - Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State for President Ford
"the IAEA report made no firm conclusion that Iran had a nuclear
weapons program, and noted that its inspections of Iran's facilities
continue to show no diversion of uranium for military purposes."
☞ PASS IT ON:
http://tinyurl.com/NYTcaught
Recommended FAIR radio show clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=r-o9fiEQK-o#t=606s
PASS IT ON ☞
http://tinyurl.com/DerailWarTrain
PASS IT ON ☞
http://tinyurl.com/WarmongerCalledOut
PASS IT ON ☞
http://tinyurl.com/WarPropagandaExposed
☀ The Record of the Paper: How the New York Times Misreports US Foreign Policy
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1844675831/ref=nosim/representativ-20
☀ Israel-Palestine on Record: How the New York Times Misreports Conflict in the Middle East
"Howard
Friel and Richard Falk reveal the persistent ways the New York Times
has ignored principles of international law in order to shield its
readers from Israel's lawlessness."
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1844671097/ref=nosim/representativ-20
NYT bias for Israel continues
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/09/nyt-bias-for-israel-continues...
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2009/01/israel-attacks-gaza-silence-f...
Warmongers who sold you the Iraq war are pushing for a war with Iran.
CLICK HERE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akWdJh7auVA&index=0&list=PL90B5A93EDB3...
FAIR Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting Action Alert
NYT Misleads Readers on Iran Crisis
Paper disappears some inaccurate reporting
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4454
Youtuber
tantzer sent me this info: In a Congressional hearing early in 2011,
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, replying to Senator
Carl Levin, confirmed that as of 2011, the American intelligence
community has a high level of confidence that Iran has not made a
decision as of this point to restart its nuclear weapons program.
This
testimony reflects the contents of the 2011 National Intelligence
Estimate. Its texts has not been released, but from the Congressional
testimony, it's clear that it repeats the conclusions of the 2007 that
since 2003 Iran has not pursued military applications of nuclear
technology. The text of the 2007 NIE was published during the Bush
presidency.
Sanger of the New York Times has often relayed
misinformation from anonymous U.S. officials to the effect that the 2011
NIE would reverse that of 2007. On 6/8/10, he wrote that the new NIE
"is using new evidence to revise and in some cases reverse conclusions
from that [2007] estimate," and that the U.S. "is gradually backing away
from a 2007 National Intelligence Estimate." On 6/15/10, he wrote that
the new estimate "is likely to back away from some of the conclusions in
the earlier document." On 3/27/10, he wrote that the 2007 NIE's key
conclusion "is also being rewritten." On 1/2/10, he wrote, "Mr. Obama's
top advisers say they no longer believe the key finding of a much
disputed National Intelligence Estimate about Iran." As of today, the
New York Times has not corrected such misinformation or tried to explain
it.
As for the 2007 NIE: the NYT's reporting gives exhaustive
coverage to criticisms of the 2007 NIE and information that seems to
contradict it. Sanger rarely referred to the NIE estimate without the
adjective "much-disputed"-- not pointing out that within the United
States, it's politicians and media pundits who dispute it quite
predictably, not U.S. intelligence organizations that voted for it 16-0
and reconfirmed it in 2011.
As late as November 6, 2011, Sanger
has sentences like this: "the report has been widely criticized as
flawed." Note the absence of any reference to the 2011 NIE as recently
as last November in a context where it should have been mentioned! And
in this story from a month ago he put the emphasis on its being "widely
criticized as flawed" rather than its having been re-affirmed.
